top of page

Old Habits, New Tech: The Myth That Only PLS Surveys Are “Good Enough”

  • Writer: Brian Layhew
    Brian Layhew
  • Nov 9
  • 8 min read

ree

You are running three active projects and every dollar counts. Traditional PLS surveys take 1-3 weeks and cost $1,500-$6,500 for a 10-acre topographic survey in the Midwest, which leaves crews waiting on elevations while clients ask for updates yesterday.* At the same time, 92% of firms say hiring is hard, and ASCE estimates we will need about 80,000 more surveyors by 2031 to meet demand.


Now picture two companies in Chicago facing that reality. One stays in the PLS queue and pays premium rates because the license is on the line. The other switches to documented drone workflows with transparent QC, gets sub-centimeter accuracy in hours, and keeps schedules moving. A year later, the first is fighting delays and cost overruns. The second is winning IIJA-funded work with fast, defensible data.


Here is the point. The shortage is not going away and traditional capacity is maxed out. The tech exists right now to leapfrog the bottleneck. Firms that adopt proven drone workflows with clear documentation capture market share while others wait in line for understaffed survey crews.

This guide outlines what experienced drone pilots deliver for engineers: design-ready surfaces, orthos, and linework without sacrificing accuracy, where a PLS stamp is still required, and how to choose the right method for each task. Faster decisions. Fewer surprises. Better margins.

The Numbers Don't Lie: What Traditional Surveys Actually Cost You

Let's get specific about what the "license on the line" mentality actually costs.

Traditional topographical survey on a 10-acre construction site: $1,500-$6,500, taking 1-3 weeks depending on weather and crew availability. That's assuming your PLS can fit you into their schedule within a month.*


Add progress surveys every month during construction: another $1,500-$6,500 each time, with typical delivery in 1-3 weeks.*


Now factor in the hidden costs: project delays while waiting for survey data, change orders from inaccurate traditional measurements, and the opportunity cost of not having real-time site intelligence for decision-making.


Here's the reality check most firms haven't done: are you paying premium prices for a PLS stamp when what you actually need is accurate, documented, defensible data? Because modern drone technology delivers exactly that, with process transparency that any engineer can review and validate.


Modern fixed-wing platforms like Wingtra can achieve absolute accuracy on the order of 1-3 cm (0.4-1.2 inches) horizontally and 1-5 cm (0.4-2 inches) vertically when paired with ground control points. That is survey-grade precision, documented with each flight and delivered same day when schedules require.


The practical difference is coverage speed. Instead of a crew spending days on site, a competent drone team can capture a full 10-acre site in roughly 2-4 hours of flight time. If weather interrupts, the team can refly as soon as conditions allow, without multi-week scheduling gaps.

The Wingtra Ray Advantage: State-of-the-Art Technology That Delivers

Equipment matters, and competent pilots choose the tool that fits the job. Many professionals fly Wingtra Ray with PPK for large, open mapping where sub-inch GSD and uniform altitude produce clean surfaces. They fly DJI RTK multirotors for complex or vertical sites, quick mobilizations, and LiDAR or inspection work. Both approaches can deliver survey-grade results when executed correctly.


Four things matter most for accuracy and workflow:


  • Accuracy that holds up. Wingtra PPK corrects raw GNSS after the flight against a base or CORS. It is tolerant of brief radio dropouts and, with GCPs plus independent check shots, routinely delivers about 1 to 3 cm horizontal and 1 to 5 cm vertical on construction sites. DJI RTK writes corrections in real time from a base or network so crews move fast. Tied to site control and validated with checks, it stays within a few centimeters as well.

  • Coverage and efficiency. Wingtra fixed-wing VTOL covers large areas quickly for subdivisions, corridors, and staging yards. DJI RTK shines in tight footprints, shaded corridors, vertical structures, and quick turn tasks.

  • Verified models, not claims. Competent pilots validate every dataset in Pix4D, Agisoft Metashape, DroneDeploy, or Esri Drone2Map. They review reprojection error, tie point density, GCP and checkpoint residuals, absolute and relative RMSE, and ground sampling distance. If a metric is off, they adjust the processing or refly.

  • Design-ready deliverables. Orthomosaics, point clouds, TINs, and clean CAD linework in the specified CRS and units, with light QC notes so downstream designers can trust and use the data.


ree

What engineers should listen for when vetting a drone provider:


  • Clear CRS and units, for example Illinois State Plane, US feet.

  • Deliverable list by file type, for example GeoTIFF, LAS/LAZ, DWG/DGN, and GDB/SHP.

  • Accuracy numbers stated plainly with GCPs and independent checkpoints.

  • PPK/RTK workflow explanation and when each is used.

  • Mention of survey receivers such as Trimble or Emlid for GCPs and check shots.


Quick primer on the positioning methods. RTK applies live corrections during flight, which speeds up fieldwork and delivers strong relative accuracy. PPK records raw observations and applies corrections after flight, which is more forgiving of link interruptions and can improve absolute accuracy. Skilled pilots pick the method that fits the risk, tolerances, terrain, and airspace.


For transparency, credible providers include a 10 to 15 page accuracy report straight from the processing software. It documents camera calibration, control layout, coordinate system and units, processing settings, reprojection error histograms, GCP and checkpoint residual tables, RMSE, density and coverage maps, and software versions. Engineers and owners can audit the work, see the numbers, and sign off with confidence. HERE and HERE are examples of those reports that you can analyze for yourself!

Process Transparency: How We Prove Quality Without the PLS Bottleneck

The real breakthrough is not just the aircraft. It is the way professionals document and validate each step. Engineers used to traditional surveys expect established procedures and known error sources. Competent drone operations provide the same transparency with measurable accuracy.

A competent pilot's workflow includes pre-flight site recon and GCP establishment with survey-grade receivers such as Trimble or Emlid, flight planning with overlap and coverage checks, live quality monitoring during capture, and post-processing validation tied to control and independent checkpoints.


Every deliverable ships with metadata that shows how the data was captured: flight parameters, weather, equipment, processing versions, and accuracy stats. An engineer can follow the chain of custody from field acquisition to CAD-ready output.


A note on licensing. Many capable drone pilots get excluded because they are not PLS. When a PLS seal is legally required, bring a PLS. When it is not, evaluate providers on documented accuracy, control methodology, and verifiable reports. Technical proof should carry the most weight.

For preliminary design, progress monitoring, volumetrics, and many as-builts, documented drone surveys often exceed traditional accuracy while delivering complete 3D models, orthomosaics, and point clouds that provide more intelligence than spot shots.


ree

The Infrastructure Boom: Why Early Adopters Win Big

The timing couldn't be better for firms ready to modernize their surveying approach. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocated $1.2 trillion for roads, bridges, broadband, water systems, and public transit through 2031. State and local governments are ramping up project planning right now.


But here's what most firms miss: the competitive advantage goes to those who can deliver comprehensive site analysis faster and cheaper than traditional methods. Infrastructure projects demand detailed documentation, progress monitoring, and compliance reporting. Traditional surveying capacity is already stretched thin, and these new projects will make the shortage worse.

Early movers establishing documented drone survey capabilities now position themselves perfectly for the infrastructure surge accelerating through the decade. While competitors wait weeks for traditional survey crews, smart firms deliver same-day results with comprehensive documentation that supports faster project approvals and better stakeholder communication.


Consider the Illinois Department of Transportation's approach to infrastructure projects. They're increasingly requiring detailed progress documentation and as-built verification. Drone surveys provide this documentation continuously throughout construction, rather than periodic snapshots from traditional methods. Projects move faster, compliance is easier, and owners get better visibility into their investments.


The federal emphasis on "Buy American" and domestic content also favors US-based drone operations with transparent supply chains and documented procedures. International competitors can't match local responsiveness and compliance capabilities.

Real Savings, Real Results: What This Means for Different Sectors

Property Developers and General Contractors

Instead of choosing between expensive surveys or incomplete data, get comprehensive site analysis that supports planning applications, tracks construction progress, and provides stakeholder updates all for significantly less than traditional methods.


A typical residential development project might spend $40,000-$60,000 on traditional surveys throughout the development cycle: initial topo, utility design surveys, construction staking, progress monitoring, and final as-built documentation. Our drone-based approach delivers the same results for 40-60% less cost, with better documentation and faster turnaround.


The competitive advantage extends beyond cost savings. Developers using drone surveys can respond to RFPs faster, provide better site intelligence to design teams, and offer clients superior progress visibility. When every project matters, these advantages add up quickly.


Civil Engineering and A/E Firms

Move beyond traditional measurement limitations with comprehensive 3D site models, multi-temporal analysis showing precise changes over time, and rapid data collection that supports tight project schedules.


Engineering firms particularly benefit from the data richness drone surveys provide. Instead of discrete survey points, engineers work with complete 3D site models, high-resolution imagery, and precise volumetric calculations. Design iterations happen faster because the base data is more complete and accurate.


For infrastructure assessment and rehabilitation projects, drone surveys provide current conditions documentation that traditional methods simply can't match. Bridge inspections, pavement condition surveys, and utility corridor mapping become faster, safer, and more comprehensive.


Municipal and Public Works Departments

Rather than budgeting large amounts for periodic comprehensive surveys, maintain continuous site intelligence with regular drone surveys that show precise progress, identify issues early, and provide documentation for public meetings and regulatory compliance.


ree

Public sector projects particularly benefit from the transparency and documentation drone surveys provide. Citizens and oversight bodies get visual progress updates that traditional survey reports can't deliver. Project accountability improves when stakeholders see exactly what's happening on their tax-dollar investments.

The Strategic Moment

This isn't just about improving survey efficiency. It's about positioning your business for what's coming.


The construction companies that thrive through the current crisis and capitalize on the infrastructure boom will be those that adopt technology improving efficiency while reducing costs, position early for government infrastructure projects, and build competitive advantages while others stick to outdated approaches.


The question isn't whether to consider drone surveys. It's whether you'll be ready when infrastructure investment accelerates through the decade, or scrambling to catch up while competitors with better data capabilities and transparent processes win the contracts.


Smart firms recognize that documented drone workflows with transparent QC aren't replacing professional surveying entirely. They're proving that for most applications, state-of-the-art technology delivers superior results faster and cheaper than traditional bottlenecks.

The crisis creates the opportunity. The technology exists. The competitive advantage goes to firms ready to modernize their approach to essential site data.

The rest will keep waiting in line, paying premium prices, and wondering why their projects always seem to run behind schedule and over budget.

Sources

Source: Industry cost and timeline data for topographical surveys obtained from Angi [2025], Today’s Homeowner [2025], and The Land Geek [2025].

*Industry cost/effectiveness and accuracy comparisons:

*Project/case studies showing results delivered to engineers:

*RTK/PPK workflow comparisons and technical guides:

Comments


9 Line Aerial Media
  • X
  • Youtube
  • alt.text.label.Facebook
  • alt.text.label.Instagram

Fully Insured and Part 107 Certified by the FAA

© 2024 9LineAerialMedia.com

bottom of page